silly poll
Sep. 11th, 2007 02:28 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
wispfoxBecause I got a really startling answer recently when I asked this question, it's now a poll! (no cheating and checking my user info)
Answers viewable to none, because otherwise I'd have to tell people I'm dating not to answer.
[Poll #1053733]
Hmm. Ignore the 'don't care' piece of the multiple answer one, since it doesn't quite fit with the rest of them.
Answers viewable to none, because otherwise I'd have to tell people I'm dating not to answer.
[Poll #1053733]
Hmm. Ignore the 'don't care' piece of the multiple answer one, since it doesn't quite fit with the rest of them.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 06:38 pm (UTC)(and the startling answer was '7')
7 is the magic number...
Date: 2007-09-11 06:47 pm (UTC)Re: 7 is the magic number...
Date: 2007-09-11 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 07:19 pm (UTC)I was just very startled at '7' being a plausible reply!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 07:44 pm (UTC)My poor brain. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 05:16 pm (UTC)7 was the number suggested to me that startled me, not the number I am actually dating. Possibly I was confusing in my phrasing.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 09:33 pm (UTC)I have some idea, but my idea is "probably 2 or more than 2, but no more than 5-ish, depending on how much into the fuzziness of involvement you want to count as 'dating'... but maybe just 2".
If you had a "probably 2 or more" option, that'd be close enough and I'd vote for it. But none of the options you listed is right for me, alas.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:47 pm (UTC)What, 'Mu' didn't work?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 10:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:51 pm (UTC)*confuses everyone* Yay!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 06:47 pm (UTC)Or, if not, tell us who it is!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:48 pm (UTC)Thus checkboxes!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 12:41 am (UTC)*meww*
no subject
Date: 2007-09-12 01:54 pm (UTC)I really didn't expect most people to be able to answer it accurately, _anyway_, since the official list was in the process of changing (indeed, I updated my user info based on one person's reply, as that was in an uncertain state). So even people I _am_ dating might answer more than one way. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 12:24 am (UTC)That's the only reason I'd care to be on it, you know :P ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-15 09:56 am (UTC)